Construction Site Accident Attorney in Toledo

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with construction site accidents, ensuring proficient representation should be your first priority. Carlson Bier stands as a premier choice for an outstanding Construction Site Accident attorney, committed to protecting the rights of victims in Toledo. With our extensive expertise on complex Illinois laws, we offer unabridged support and competent counsel to those affected by such adversities. Emphasizing stringent safety standards violation lawsuits and workers’ compensation claims among other aspects related to instance-specific injuries endured at these accident-prone terrains, we always strive for maintaining highest professional integrity witnessed from last several decades. Our law firm’s vast experience across numerous cases reflect its dedication towards client satisfaction supported by a proven track record displayed via significant compensations awarded apart from fair settlements secured consistently over time without any compromise on the quality of services rendered at affordable fees structure optimally pieces with utmost convenience in mind embedded within every aspect of our actions representing workers who have suffered debilitating losses during their arduous dutiesat respective construction worksites amid unfortunate circumstances that demand rightful justice throughout Ohio including Toledo indeed deservedly so.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Toledo Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a practiced, committed group of personal injury attorneys specializing in construction site accidents. Based in Illinois, our primary objective is to make legal representation accessible and useful for those afflicted by the repercussions of such incidents, so they can secure the justice they deserve. We aim to provide value with instructive material on Construction Site Accidents.

Construction site accidents can leave physical and emotional scar tissue that interrupts everyday life. They typically occur due to numerous reasons like inadequate training, disregard of safety protocols, or faulty equipment. As such incidents result in grave injuries or even fatalities sometimes, it’s crucial to comprehend your rights as a worker within the construction industry.

You deserve safeguarding and remuneration if you are an accident victim at a construction site. Here are various essential factors underlined to offer understanding into Construction Site Accident laws:

• Worker’s Compensation: This law offers benefits to employees who sustain injuries during service but inhibit suing their employers directly.

• Third-Party Claims: An injured employee might be entitled to file a lawsuit against parties (not including their employer) whose negligence led to the incident.

• Product Liability: If heavy machinery operating during work hours malfunctions leading to injuries; manufacturers could be held responsible.

• Wrongful Deaths: Family members can file this claim if an accident results in losing their loved ones.

With legal issues revolving around Construction Site Accident being complex, navigational aid from skilled lawyers becomes vital for victims seeking restitution. At Carlson Bier, we’ve represented victims associated with distinct roles inside the construction industry for numerous years comprising carpenters, electricians, machine operators, laborers among others.

We adopt an individualized interface tailored towards each client’s unique circumstances while adopting aggressive stratagems that effectively strive towards securing maximum compensation for all claims tied with medical bills (past and future), wage loss plus pain & suffering experienced owing to these catastrophes.

Our proficiency extends beyond just litigation, meta-analysis and claims processing. Our team persistently works with healthcare specialists, accident reconstruction experts, investigation agencies—marshalling vital evidences that substantiate each case competently.

Navigating through the challenges of a construction site accident can be traumatic and taxing. One requires exceptional representation to ensure a thorough quest for justice is carried out—an affirmative we at Carlson Bier are proud to promise.

As renowned personal injury attorneys situated in Illinois, Carlson Bier assesses every client’s unique situation meticulously while putting extensive experiences to good use—we leverage our effort and acumen towards single-mindedly bringing accountable those responsible for causing hurt or loss on a Human life during Construction Site Accidents.

Safety at construction sites should never be compromised! At Carlson Bier, we firmly believe it. If you share this belief too but seem entangled amid unfortunate circumstances due to some else’s sheer negligence; reach out for an attorney who acknowledges his clients’ plight empathetically yet takes action assertively against those who’ve caused it.

Aiming at bringing transparency into our legal engagements right from the inception point onwards, we’d like to garnish your trust by letting you understand what your case might be worth. Don’t let query bubbles grow larger by wondering how much compensation justification we can get you—it’s time to prick them all!

Discover the worth of your construction site accident claim by clicking the button below right away. Let our seasoned professionals at Carlson Bier guide you through legal proceedings while diligently calculating an estimated reward subject to being claimed against injuries suffered due to negligent practices in any constructions site in Illinois.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Toledo Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Toledo

Areas of Practice in Toledo

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Expert in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Supplying skilled legal assistance for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Healthcare Incompetence

Extending experienced legal support for clients affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Liability

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, providing adept legal guidance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Elder Misconduct

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Tumble Mishaps

Specialist in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking justice for their suffering.

Infant Traumas

Extending legal aid for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Concentrated on assisting individuals of car accidents get fair compensation for hurts and losses.

Scooter Accidents

Specializing in providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Truck Mishap

Delivering expert legal support for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for damages.

Building Incidents

Focused on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Head Damages

Dedicated to ensuring compassionate legal representation for victims suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Traumas

Proficient in addressing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Dedicated to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Death

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and skilled legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Dedicated to supporting victims with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer