FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Ottawa

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one are unfortunate enough to suffer injuries as a result of a pedestrian accident in Ottawa, it’s crucial to have the right legal representation to secure maximum compensation. Consider your safety and financial security under the competent hands of Carlson Bier – experts in dealing with intricate litigation procedures associated with these kinds of incidents. As veteran Personal Injury lawyers, we not only excel at proving liability but also adeptly quantify damages ensuring victims receive what they earnestly deserve. Our firm’s commitment lies within advocating justice without compromise; comprehending detailed nuances specific to Pedestrian Accident cases is our forte’. At Carlson Bier – resilience is our signature trait where rebuilding lives after traumatic experiences forms the cornerstone of our practice. Trust us for personalized dedication towards your case intertwined with impeccable professionalism that surpasses ordinary realms—Because when it comes down to safeguarding your rights against powerful adversaries, believe that every detail counts! Reach out today – We’re here, standing by fervently for YOU!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Ottawa Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our legal expertise extends strongly towards personal injury cases resulting from pedestrian accidents. A realm of law with its unique challenges and stipulations, pedestrian accident cases can pose numerous complexities that demand a well-founded understanding to navigate successfully. As personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we are skilled in handling such cases and advocate for your rights fervently.

Pedestrian accidents often precipitate severe injuries which can be life-altering or fatal. Unfortunately, they occur aplenty; with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reporting nearly 6,000 pedestrian deaths annually as a result of traffic crashes. Falls, collisions with bicycles or motor vehicles usually culminate in such unfortunate incidents.

These are commonly caused by factors such as:

– Distracted or reckless driving

– Ignorance of traffic signals

– Driving under intoxication

– Failure to yield to pedestrians at crosswalks

Following a pedestrian accident incident, knowing one’s rights is crucial. In Illinois, personal injury law allows injured victims to pursue compensation covering medical bills, lost wages, pain & suffering and additional unforeseen expenses attributable to the mishap. However, winning such claims relies heavily on proving liability; that another party’s negligence or intentional actions precipitated the incident causing injury.

As experienced personal injury lawyers dealing with pedestrian accident cases in Illinois – where comparative negligence laws apply – we understand how crucial it’s establishing fault. Comparative negligence implicates that both parties involved could bear some responsibility. Herein lies our strength; gathering substantial evidence while working meticulously with investigative teams to reinforce your case thereby boosting chances of a satisfactory settlement or verdict in your favor.

Being versed with “pedestrians’ duty of care”, we recognize that pedestrians have responsibilities too towards ensuring their safety along roadways which if overlooked might influence awarded compensations during claims filing thus showcasing an understanding extensive enough promising unwavering support throughout required legal proceedings

Our zeal equips us to get in the ring with insurance companies as well, contesting their often dubious tactics aimed at minimizing or completely eschewing compensated damages. Comprehending that pedestrian accidents and consequent legal proceedings can be overwhelming for victims and their families, we ensure provision of empathetic counsel while aggressively championing your rights in litigation processes.

Remember, effective representation is anchored upon choosing reliable personal injury lawyers specially trained to handle pedestrian accident cases, as they guarantee formidable defense strategies paired with commendable negotiation skills tirelessly yielding towards winning you proper justice and fair compensation

We invite you to discover how Carlson Bier’s professional resources can make a significant difference in your personal injury claim’s outcome. With our comprehension of Illinois laws combined with an unyielding commitment to client service delivery, chances for optimal recovery increases significantly.

Navigating through complexities distinguishing every pedestrian accident case while embarking on a journey pursuing equal justice regardless of whether accidents occurred within designated crosswalks or outside is what sets us apart as distinctive yet top-ranking amongst other law firms extended throughout Illinois.

Recognizing that each case is unique necessitating personalized attention only fuels our resolve in walking hand-in-hand with you during such trying times bridging gaps first-time accident victims face aggressively providing indispensable information like ensuing medical treatment protocol adherence tips post accidents further accentuating our dedication towards securing better futures after unfortunate occurrences brought life momentum to a standstill.

Connect with us today! Click the button below for a complimentary consultation where we provide enlightened insights about potential compensations owed too; becoming better informed means making better choices – embark on this journey conferring ability upon yourself deserving rightful claims undeterred by circumstances attempting otherwise – choose Carlson Bier today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ottawa Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Ottawa

Areas of Practice in Ottawa

Cycling Mishaps

Expert in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Fire Damages

Offering specialist legal assistance for patients of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Physician Negligence

Providing experienced legal representation for patients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Responsibility

Handling cases involving problematic products, providing professional legal support to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Mistreatment

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Trip Occurrences

Specialist in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking justice for their damages.

Newborn Harms

Providing legal aid for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Mishaps: Dedicated to supporting patients of car accidents get appropriate remuneration for hurts and losses.

Motorbike Mishaps

Committed to providing legal assistance for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Big Rig Mishap

Offering specialist legal support for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for harms.

Building Collisions

Dedicated to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Head Traumas

Dedicated to extending dedicated legal representation for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Skilled in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Wrongful Death

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and expert legal guidance to ensure redress.

Neural Trauma

Expert in assisting individuals with paralysis, offering professional legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​