Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Ogden

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Welcome to Carlson Bier, Illinois’s trusted Spinal Cord Injuries law firm. When you’re dealing with the aftermath of such a traumatic event, it’s crucial that you have legal representation from experienced advocates who understand your unique challenges. Our attorneys specialize in spinal cord injuries, fighting for victims’ rights tirelessly and ensuring they receive maximum compensation.

We at Carlson Bier possess years of experience handling cases relating to spinal cord trauma, representing clients skilfully and compassionately throughout their journey towards recovery. Unlike other firms as we bridge knowledge gaps by having an unwavering commitment to serving justice for those inflicted with life-changing injuries.

Being part of Ogden community’s fabric for many years has given us deep insights into its people’s needs and concerns when seeking rightful damages post-spinal cord injury accidents. We comprehend associated complexities from medical malpractice claims to automobile incidents within the context specific to our valued residents’ requirements in Ogden.

Choosing us means assigning a dedicated team whose primary concern is not just winning your case but advocating on your behalf until full recompense arrives. Allow Carlson Bier the privilege; let us become instrumental in your path back towards reclaiming control over life after enduring a devastating spinal cord injury.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Ogden Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in understanding complex fields of law to provide you with the competent representation you require. Personal injury-related legal battles can be highly demanding and stressful – especially when dealing with debilitating injuries such as spinal cord damage – but our devoted team will stand by your side diligently until justice prevails.

As expert personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we aid clients who have sustained life-altering spinal cord injuries. In this pursuit, it becomes critical to fully comprehend the nuances and implications of such injuries which aren’t limited to mere physical impairment. Spinal cord injuries often result in severe psychological trauma due to resultant immobility or a significant reduction in essential bodily functions. This is not just about winning cases; it’s about safeguarding your quality of life.

Spinal cord injuries are grouped into ‘complete’ where there is total loss of function below the level of injury, and ‘incomplete,’ where some functionality remains. Both types could cause secondary conditions such as respiratory complications, bowel, bladder control issues, chronic pain amongst others. Our seasoned lawyers at Carlson Bier understand each aspect intimately and employ this knowledge while arguing your case effectively.

Delving deeper into the subject:

• A person may lose movement, sensation or reflex function contingent on which part of their spinal cord was impacted.

• The immediate area surrounding the trauma site isn’t necessarily the only affected region.

• Despite popular belief, spinal cord damage does not always induce paralysis: varying degrees of impairment could manifest instead.

By understanding these foundational points regarding spinal cord injuries – including their classification and presentation – one can recognize how extensively these ailments alter lives.

In light of its devastating consequences and long-term health impacts, victims must receive appropriate compensation that covers medical bills for treatment now and foreseeable future expenses too (for instance continued rehabilitation therapies). The role our personal injury attorneys serve then becomes unequivocally vital: assuring all economic damages rightfully reach your hands while also catering for non-economic damages like pain and suffering or lifestyle adjustments required.

So, why choose our experienced team at Carlson Bier? We offer extended expertise in handling intricate personal injury cases -including spinal cord injuries- by integrating strategic foresight with compassionate understanding. Our comprehensive knowledge base facilitates effective lawsuit presentation, backed by a proven track record of success that echoes our commitment to clients.

Another consideration is the time-sensitive nature of suing for personal injuries – every state has its own statute of limitations; exclusive deadlines within which lawsuits must be filed. In Illinois, the general time-constraint happens to be two years from the date of accident occurring or discovery thereof in most cases.

We understand navigating through legal avenues post-trauma can indeed seem daunting, hence appointing trustworthy representation becomes essential., Endeavour not only towards seeking justice but also walking this unforeseen path together enlightening you about your rights and entitlements throughout the process. After all, your well-being remains central to our operations; we measure victories not merely via monetary accumulations but actual positive impacts generated in lives.

Why continue shouldering such burdens unaided? Optimally equipped with thorough academic proficiency combined with practical experience spanning decades allow us at Carlson Bier to deftly handle even complicated litigations associated with extreme injuries especially focused on spinal cord mishaps – thus providing efficient resolutions enhancing client confidence and satisfaction.

Intrigued about how we might assist you in fighting for justice owed? Take advantage of our swift case evaluation feature embedded just below and learn how much could be available for collection as part of your due settlement: exactly what righteously belongs to you! Click on the button now to initiate this journey towards recovery together with us – dedicated specialists relentlessly protecting interests while passionately pursuing justice till it prevails.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ogden Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Ogden

Areas of Practice in Ogden

Bicycle Crashes

Proficient in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or perilous conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Supplying adept legal services for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Medical Negligence

Offering expert legal support for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Liability

Dealing with cases involving defective products, delivering adept legal services to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Malpractice

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Stumble Incidents

Specialist in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking redress for their damages.

Newborn Wounds

Providing legal support for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Accidents: Committed to helping victims of car accidents receive equitable compensation for harms and damages.

Motorbike Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal services for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Truck Crash

Providing adept legal advice for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for losses.

Building Site Mishaps

Engaged in defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Head Impairments

Dedicated to ensuring expert legal support for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Wounds

Skilled in handling cases for people who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Accidents

Expert in legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Undeserved Fatality

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and professional legal services to ensure restitution.

Neural Injury

Focused on representing clients with paralysis, offering professional legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer