Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Lincoln Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a dog bite injury, finding reliable legal assistance is crucial. Where better to turn than Carlson Bier, Illinois’ premier personal injury attorney group with extensive experience in handling dog-bite cases? Armed with vast knowledge about Illinois state laws regarding animal attacks and injuries, specifically those inflicted by dogs, Carlson Bier offers unmatched expertise. They are dedicated to ensuring their clients receive the justice they deserve and compensation for damages sustained. Our team is ready to go above and beyond for your legal needs while dealing with Dog Bite Injuries. With an impressive track record litigating such cases successfully – securing fair recompense for medical bills & emotional anguish caused due to these traumatic incidents – along with express commitment towards each client’s case distinguishes Carlson Bier from its competitors. Friendly yet professional; compassionate yet aggressive – this firm strikes the necessary balance to ensure positive outcomes aligning best interest of our clientele: making us your ideal choice when needed most during distressful dog-bite situations..

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Lincoln Park Illinois

Understanding the complexity of dog bite injuries is crucial before taking legal action. At Carlson Bier, one of Illinois’ leading personal injury attorney groups, we believe in educating our readers on this pressing issue while offering expert legal aid tailored to your needs.

Dog bites can lead to a variety of severe physical and psychological damages. The aftermath of such tragic incidents can leave victims with mounting medical bills, lifetime scarring, emotional distress, loss of wages due to inability to work, not mentioning the trauma experienced by both adults and children alike.

Injuries from a dog attack are typically categorised into three types – puncture wounds, crushed bones or muscle tissue damage and infections transmitted through the bite. Puncture wounds may seem minor but can potentially cause serious internal injuries if left untreated. On the other hand, crushing attacks can lead to severe impairment requiring considerable medical attention including surgeries for reconstruction. Additionally, infections like rabies cannot be taken lightly as they can prove fatal if not addressed immediately.

The State Law in Illinois clearly holds the dog’s owner strictly liable for any harm or injury caused by their dog. This means that proving negligence on part of the pet owner is unnecessary; it only needs to be demonstrated that the injury was indeed caused by their pet. In certain cases where multiple dogs are involved or ownership is unclear, you might find yourself navigating complex legal territory which underscores why professional legal assistance becomes paramount.

At Carlson Bier, our team has vast experience dealing specifically with personal injury claims involving animal attacks and primarily dogs – making us uniquely qualified to assist you every step of your recovery journey. By partnering with us:

• You benefit from our wealth of expertise garnered over years helping clients successfully navigate similar cases.

• Your case receives personalized attention right down ensuring meticulous preparation for all eventualities including court trials should out-of-court settlements fail.

• Our vast network enables access to top-tier medical experts who ensure accurate depiction and proof of sustained injuries facilitating successful claim resolution.

Handling a dog bite case goes beyond just getting compensation for the physical injuries sustained. The emotional and psychological effects of such incidents can last a lifetime and lead to conditions like post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, or depression. These mental health consequences need to be captured in your personal injury claim.

Successfully compiling all medical proof including records, bills, expert testimonies – coupled with accurately calculating future potential losses owing to impaired capacity and proving non-tangible damages like pain and suffering are key aspects that we handle at Carlson Bier. Our commitment is not only towards procuring the rightful compensation you deserve but also facilitating an environment where you can focus primarily on recovery free from legal hassle.

Remember, time is of the essence when filing a dog bite lawsuit as Statute of Limitations in Illinois typically gives victims two years from date of injury to sue for personal injuries. This timeline might seem ample but gathering all necessary documents, strategic planning culminating into launching of litigation process takes significant effort wherein swift action plays an instrumental role.

Being victimized by a dog bite incident can be tremendously overwhelming and burdensome – physically, emotionally and financially. But it’s important to remember that you’re not alone. With over decades’ worth experience handling such cases, our team at Carlson Bier has helped numerous individuals reclaim their life back post severe canine attacks.

Today could be your turning point towards better days ahead – click the button below right away and find out how much your case may potentially be worth. Dive deep into what Carlson Bier brings on-board for comprehensive legal advocacy ensuring justice prevails while offering professional support throughout this journey amidst these trying times.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lincoln Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Lincoln Park

Areas of Practice in Lincoln Park

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Proficient in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Flame Damages

Giving skilled legal assistance for patients of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Medical Misconduct

Providing specialist legal assistance for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Fault

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, providing skilled legal guidance to customers affected by harmful products.

Senior Malpractice

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Stumble Incidents

Adept in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking redress for their losses.

Newborn Traumas

Extending legal assistance for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Collisions

Crashes: Dedicated to assisting patients of car accidents get equitable settlement for hurts and harm.

Motorcycle Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Truck Crash

Ensuring specialist legal services for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for injuries.

Worksite Crashes

Committed to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Head Injuries

Expert in delivering compassionate legal assistance for persons suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Traumas

Adept at addressing cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unfair Demise

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and adept legal support to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Injury

Specializing in supporting persons with backbone trauma, offering professional legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer