Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Heritage Lake

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve been involved in a pedestrian accident, it’s paramount to have lawyers like Carlson Bier on your side. With an extensive background in personal injury law, the attorneys at Carlson Bier are well-versed in navigating complex cases of this nature. Our team is capable of investigating and analyzing all aspects of your incident accurately to help ensure that those responsible are held accountable for their actions. Regularly working with clients suffering from injuries resulting from pedestrian accidents, our highly skilled litigators strive diligently for favorable verdicts and substantial settlements.

Regardless of where incidents occur, whether you’re strolling leisurely down familiar paths or rushing along busy intersections across Heritage Lake; we understand the unique complexities associated with such legal cases here at Carlson Bier. We comprehend how these severe encounters can profoundly impact victims’ lives; hence our dedication towards assisting every claimant secure justice.

Carlson Bier advocates emphatically for its clients while delivering personalized attention alongside sophisticated representation – essentials when dealing with insurance agencies or defendant lawyers trying to minimize compensation owed. In choosing us as your advocate after a distressing pedestrian accident around Heritage Lake environs, having confidence that competent hands manage your case is guaranteed because excellence remains resolute within our practice: Carlson Bier- unrivaled expertise embedded firmly in Illinois personal injury law sphere.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Heritage Lake Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we prioritize your rights and welfare as a pedestrian. Your safety in traversing the public walkways of Illinois is significantly important to us. We believe that every individual has the right to access the roads without fear, thus when accidents occur, our personal injury attorneys are equipped with extensive experience and knowledge in handling Pedestrian Accident cases.

Pedestrian accidents can occur due to various reasons such as reckless driving, impaired vision, or failure to yield at crosswalks. The aftermath can be devastating including injuries like fractures, spinal cord injuries, traumatic brain injuries (TBI), or even death in severe cases.

– Reckless Driving: Speeding cars may not provide enough time for pedestrians to move out of harm’s way causing serious injuries.

– Impaired Vision: It might be difficult for drivers to spot pedestrians during nighttime or poor weather conditions leading to accidents.

– Failure To Yield At Crosswalks: Despite traffic rules mandating motorists stop for pedestrians at walk paths, some motorists neglect this requirement thus putting pedestrians at risk.

To understand these situations better and ensure justice is served accordingly, it’s paramount that victims seek expert legal representation from personal injury lawyers who focus specifically on Pedestrian Accidents. Not only do we aid you in understanding the intricacies of pedestrian accident claims but also strive vigorously to get the best possible outcome on your behalf with all elements considered.

In most cases regarding personal injury claims following a Pedicab accident lawsuit, compensation includes medical expenses ensued due to injuries sustained from the impact; loss of wages incurred while recuperating; as well as non-economic damages which include mental distress among others.

At Carlson Bier:

– Medical Expenses: We will fight vigorously on your behalf so you can recover current and future financial burdens resulting from hospital bills and rehabilitation costs related directly to your pedestrian accident.

– Income Loss: For any income lost while recovering from your accident-related injury(ies), you may seek compensation for these losses throughout your recuperation.

– Mental Distress: Psychological distress, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and emotional dejection, caused by the accident can also be compensated.

A crucial part of why Carlson Bier maintains its superb appeal in personal injury law is our dedication to provide top-notch legal service. We are deeply committed to every case we undertake, treating them all with the gravity they deserve while working energetically to ensure fair and just compensation.

Our team of dedicated attorneys brings numerous years of combined experienced in myriad Pedestrian Accident lawsuits across Illinois. Our professional approach and commitment have resulted in significant financial settlements for countless clients who were victims of pedestrian accidents. Furthermore, at Carlson Bier we exercise a no-win-no fee policy thereby alleviating you from any risks involved during litigation.

When it comes to navigating through Pedestrian Accidents claims process trust that you are not alone; our quality legal assistance is right here within your reach. Begin your journey towards seeking justice today by exploring what Carlson Bier Attorneys at Law has to offer.

We invite you now to utilize the evaluation tool below which will help guide you on how much your case might be worth based upon an initial assessment using common factors under Illinois state laws. This tool will give some insight into potential compensation figures related directly with your specific Pedestrian Accident case circumstances.

Please take a moment now to click the button below for our quick yet detailed questionnaire about your situation so we can assist you promptly and efficiently – because pursuing a pedestrian accident claim timeously could make an impactful difference between receiving fair compensations versus inconsequential ones or worse- none at all! Together let’s pave way towards achieving justice swiftly deserved. Trust Carlson Bier with getting you there because getting justice done right matters immensely!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Heritage Lake Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Heritage Lake

Areas of Practice in Heritage Lake

Cycling Accidents

Proficient in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Providing skilled legal services for people of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Hospital Incompetence

Extending dedicated legal advice for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, extending specialist legal support to customers affected by defective items.

Elder Neglect

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble & Trip Mishaps

Adept in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking justice for their injuries.

Neonatal Harms

Delivering legal aid for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Incidents: Focused on assisting patients of car accidents obtain just settlement for wounds and harm.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Focused on providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

18-Wheeler Collision

Extending expert legal support for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Committed to supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Brain Impairments

Specializing in offering dedicated legal advice for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Injuries

Adept at tackling cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Loss

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and expert legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Neural Damage

Focused on representing individuals with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer