Products Liability Attorney in Canton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When searching for an astute Products Liability attorney, Carlson Bier transcends expectations. Ensuring the protection and rightful compensation of our clients in Canton from faulty products is a cause we ardently uphold. With years of experience at the forefront of product liability law, Carlson Bier discerns every nuance incident to each case with absolute precision. Our firm diligently fights against injustice, holding manufacturers accountable for produced goods that harm users or do not meet obligatory standards. We exhibit meticulous proficiency while investigating complex cases surrounding defective design, manufacturing faults or insufficient warning labels on a commodity that caused injury or damage. Our formidable reputation due to successful litigations testifies our caliber as distinguished lawyers in this field and your best choice in trusting us for handling your litigation needs responsibly under Illinois laws. Trustworthy representation with dedicated pursuit towards client interest has made us synonymous with superb legal service within product liability cases around Canton area without violating any geographical marketing regulations by state bar. At Carlson Bier, justice always prevails.

About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Canton Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your safety and rights are our primary concern. As an expert team of personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we specialize in various aspects of the field including Products Liability. In such circumstances, a product you used caused harm because it was defective or poorly designed. Comprehending this complex litigation is daunting for most individuals, but we’re here to decode every corner of it.

Products Liability Law protects consumers from dangerous products that lead to injuries or accidents. These could range from medical devices and pharmaceutical drugs to motor vehicles and household appliances. When injuries occur due to faulty design, manufacturing defects, or inadequate warnings and instructions, one can claim compensation under this legal provision with suitable representation.

It’s essential to remember three key points when considering Products Liability:

• The person injured by a product must demonstrate that the item was indeed defective.

• The defect in question directly resulted in harm.

• The injured party used the product as it was intended at the time of damage occurred.

Without these proof-points substantiated, even an established case might fall apart which stresses the importance of having dedicated assistance like ours at your side.

Whichever angle your products liability case may revolve around – design flaws speak about inherent dangers posed by a product even before production; manufacturing defects refer issues encountered during its assembly; lack of sufficient warning indicate omission of crucial usage instructions impacting users’ security – at Carlson Bier we offer specialized expertise across these categories bolstered through years serving Illinois citizens.

The complexity involved in proving these concepts deserves emphasis here:

Design Flaws- Demonstrating a safer alternative design would have been possible while retaining reasonable cost factor can be challenging as patent laws come into play often protecting certain designs exclusively making them non-feasible alternatives despite being safer on paper.

Manufacturing Defects- Proving accidental negligence during manufacturing juxtaposed against ‘unavoidable safe harbor’ clause which gives manufacturers some protection over unavoidable mishaps can be tricky and requires adept navigation of the legal framework.

Warning Deficiencies- It involves comparatively simpler yet rigorous process to validate missing or inadequate warnings about potential risks associated with normal product use.

At Carlson Bier, our commitment is to amplify your voice in claiming justified compensation while removing hurdles planted by complexities entwined within Products Liability litigation. Our expert representation ensures no stone remains unturned during evidence gathering, case evaluation, counteracting defendant arguments or even court trial if needed.

While risk from defective products cuts across demographics, consumer justice does not have to. We’re dedicated advocates for the individuals who have suffered under faulty designs carelessly launched into the market without enough consideration on their impact. We believe there’s an ethical dimension to what we do that rises above legal battles and finds its root in fundamental human rights – everyone deserves safety when using product purchased lawfully.

Navigating through a products liability claim is arduous process but at Carlson Bier we guide you seamlessly every step of the way; enabling informed decision making while also escalating your pain points effectively having them heard rightfully through decades-long experience in this field.

Products liability claims are time sensitive too which makes it imperative seeking consultation as expediently as possible post incident occurrence. If you’ve been injured resulting from a defective product, don’t waver on exploring full breadth of your legal options in collaboration with us who are here offering steadfast representation standing unequivocally beside Illinois citizens.

Intrigued about how much your case could potentially bring forth? Prompt action now could rapidly elevate chances of favorable outcome for your situation. Don’t wait another minute! We invite you to click on the button below, leverage Carlson Bier’s expertise today and see how much your case’s worth truly should be!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed. Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that: 1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages; 2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and 3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed. The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed. Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that: 1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and 2 setoff clauses were enforceable. Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted. Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that: 1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and 2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits. Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Canton Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Canton

Areas of Practice in Canton

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or risky conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Extending professional legal advice for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Medical Misconduct

Offering professional legal assistance for persons affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, providing skilled legal guidance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Senior Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Slip Mishaps

Specialist in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking redress for their suffering.

Birth Harms

Offering legal assistance for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Collisions: Committed to aiding individuals of car accidents get reasonable compensation for damages and damages.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Truck Mishap

Offering expert legal assistance for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for injuries.

Construction Site Collisions

Focused on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Head Injuries

Specializing in delivering specialized legal support for individuals suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Damages

Specialized in addressing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Specializing in legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Death

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and experienced legal guidance to ensure justice.

Neural Impairment

Expert in advocating for clients with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer