Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Bismarck

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the devastating reality of a spinal cord injury, you deserve an advocate who will fight for your justice tirelessly. Carlson Bier offers top-tier legal representation in all aspects related to spinal cord injuries, providing clients with much-needed peace of mind during such challenging times. With meticulous attention to detail and an empathetic approach, our team elevates understanding while maintaining relentless commitment toward achieving desired outcomes. In particular situations where negligence or misconduct caused the harm suffered, we aim to hold responsible parties accountable through every possible legal avenue afforded under Illinois law’s comprehensive framework – striving for maximum compensation on behalf of our clientele. Expertly navigating intricate litigation processes can be overwhelming – but not when supported by Carlson Bier; renowned specialists capable of translating complex realities into feasible strategies appreciating individual circumstances encapsulated within each unique case profile entrusted unto us – making us a compelling choice as Spinal Cord Injury attorneys. Trust us with your journey towards justice; trust Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Bismarck Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted Illinois-based personal injury law firm specializing in spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord injuries are severe and life-altering afflictions that can dramatically alter a person’s quality of life and livelihood. We understand the physical adversity and emotional stress that you may be going through following such traumatic events, which is why we are here to provide the expert legal guidance that you need.

Spinal Cord Injuries significantly affect the body’s motor skills and sensory function as they involve direct harm to the central communicative pathway between the brain and other parts of the body. The complexities involved make them unique among other forms of injuries. Depending on where along the spinal column injury occurs, differing levels of paralysis can result:

• Cervical (neck) injuries usually result in quadriplegia or tetraplegia.

• Thoracic (chest level) spinal cord injuries typically cause paraplegia.

• Lumbosacral spine or Lumbar (lower back) and sacral spine section often impact control over hips and legs.

It is vital to note that though medical advancements do offer remedial measures for victims, full recovery from severe Spinal Cord Injuries is generally not possible at present. Thus, victims often have mounting medical expenses coupled with a diminished ability or inability altogether to make a living throughout their lifetime.

At Carlson Bier, our committed team of professional lawyers has extensive experience handling cases involving Spinal Cord Injury victims. The compensation we strive for takes into account current medical bills, future rehabilitative needs, loss of income now and ever-possible long-term earnings perilously jeopardized due to injury. Additionally, factors underlying potential pain suffering arising directly from your condition also come under our consideration spectrum for case value development.

We know how crucial expert witness testimonies can be while making a strong representation before court sessions or insurance companies. Our lawyers maintain good relationships with seasoned medical experts who conduct exhaustive assessments of your health situations and offer a credible counter to the opposition’s lesser injury implications push.

Getting appropriate compensation in personal injury lawsuits involving Spinal Cord Injuries is multifaceted. Substantial legal knowledge, immense patience, effective negotiation skills, thorough preparation, apt utilization of healthcare professionals for validation are among the resources at our disposal. Carlson Bier pledges full dedication towards ethically securing every dime you’re lawfully entitled to under Illinois State statutes.

As leading litigators in our respective field, we believe education is key to understanding one’s rights post-injury. Therefore, beyond delivering advice and representation during legal contretemps related to injuries, we also aim at providing valuable comprehension about their underlying medical aspects and likely prognoses along with monetary impacts thereof.

Assessing case value is a complicated process influenced by multiple factors unique to each case scenario. If faced with such unfortunate circumstances, then understanding what your rightful claim could be worth becomes crucial indeed. You deserve an advocate who fights ardently for your cause while seamlessly navigating through intricate litigation norms within our jurisdictional limits.

The knowledgeable attorneys at Carlson Bier invite you to click on the button below this informative content focusing on ‘Spinal Cord Injury claims’. Find out what your deserving claim might amount to under existing legislatures.Together we shall make just compensation possible notwithstanding how daunting that vision appears initially or the party responsible for causing such grave damage remains cunningly elusive.

One should never underestimate complexities when it comes down ensuring justice from calculated negligent parties – they will spare no expense trying put their interests first but so do we! Get in touch immediately; waiting only benefits those who ought engaging instead aiding you during these testing times rightfully so!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bismarck Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Bismarck

Areas of Practice in Bismarck

Bicycle Incidents

Focused on legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Flame Burns

Supplying adept legal advice for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Physician Incompetence

Providing specialist legal advice for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Liability

Handling cases involving unsafe products, extending specialist legal guidance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Misconduct

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Trip Occurrences

Adept in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking compensation for their losses.

Childbirth Wounds

Providing legal aid for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Car Accidents

Crashes: Focused on helping sufferers of car accidents secure fair recompense for wounds and destruction.

Motorbike Collisions

Committed to providing legal services for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Trucking Accident

Extending specialist legal assistance for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for damages.

Building Site Incidents

Focused on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Neurological Harms

Expert in providing professional legal services for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Traumas

Expertise in handling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Fatality

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and experienced legal support to ensure restitution.

Spine Impairment

Focused on supporting clients with paralysis, offering specialized legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer